Debra Jean Milke – convicted of shooting Christopher Conan Milke’s son
- Posted on
On December 2, 1990, 2-year-old Christopher Conan Milke was shot and killed by an unknown assailant in Phoenix, Arizona. Though this was a tragedy that should never have happened, it takes an even more sinister turn when it was learned that the assailant was non other than Debra Jean Milke who acted as the victim’s mother.
Debra Milke was convicted in 1995 of conspiring to murder her son and for being involved in the actual shooting. The motive for the murder appears to be monetary as Debra Milke wanted to collect a $50,000 life insurance policy on her son and spend it on luxury items.
Debra’s conviction came after two police officers testified that she had confessed to her involvement in the crime. This confession was later proved to be false and the two officers were found guilty of perjury and misconduct. An appeals court argued that this testimony had been evidence for Milke’s conviction and thus threw out her sentence.
The effects of her conviction have been numerous and heartbreaking. Jail time aside, Debra Milke has received death threats as well as having her name publicly circulated. To this day, people still treat her with suspicion or fear when she is out in public or visiting friends. She continues to try and rebuild her life after serving 27 years behind bars while unfairly accused of a crime she did not commit.
Christopher Conan Milke’s death will forever be a tragedy and a reminder of our legal system’s flaws, as well as how innocent people could be treated in an unjust manner. We can only hope that going forward more care will be taken to ensure that no innocent person faces such a great loss while the real perpetrators are brought to justice.
On December 2nd, 1990, Debra Jean Milke was arrested and later convicted of the premeditated murder of her four year-old son, Christopher Conan Milke. This case has gained attention due to the lack of any physical evidence linking her to the crime in question and many believe that she is innocent.
The prosecution’s case rested primarily on the conflicting statement of a detective and another individual who claimed that Debra had confessed to him. Over time, the prosecution’s claims fell fraught with controversy as it came to light that detectives may have intentionally withheld evidence from defense attorneys in order to secure a conviction. For over twenty years, the courts have debated over this case, but one fact remains clear: Christopher was shot and killed at an Arizona shopping mall on December 2nd, 1990.
At the time of her arrest, Debra Jean Milke was assumed guilty from the start despite not having any physical evidence linking her to the crime. This is what has earned this case notoriety as many people argue that she was wrongfully convicted without being able to stand trial – or at least exonerate herself with an alibi – due to the lack of reliable testimony brought forth against her.
In 2014, a ruling by a U.S. District Judge mandated that Debra receive a new trial due to the failure of authorities to disclose material evidence during her conviction. As of 2019, nothing has come from this ruling and it is still uncertain as to whether she will receive a proper trial or whether she is innocent or guilty or even see justice for her son’s death. This case however serves as a reminder of how far our court system has evolved when it comes to dealing with guilt and innocence when lacking pertinent evidence such as bodily remains or other forms of scientific evidence. The future of Debra Jean Milke’s accusations will remain uncertain until the conclusions are officially declared.