Judge Cheryl K. Hendrix



Judge Cheryl Hendrix


Return to previous page eMail a friend Download this page in Acrobat format printable version
Translate this page into Spanish
Translate this page into French
Translate this page into German
using FreeTranslation.com
Free web and text translation


On Wednesday, October 10, 1990, the Phoenix Gazette headline was

"MILKE CASE FACING MISTRIAL,
JUDGE HENDRIX SAYS"

Byline by J.W. Brown

Time is running out for Debra Jean Milke's trial as it enters its fourth week. The case could end in a mistrial if it is not concluded by Thursday.

On Tuesday, Judge CHERYL HENDRIX of Maricopa County Superior Court warned attorneys that "two jurors have travel plans at the end of the week that cannot be changed". Their departures will cause the jury panel to drop to 11 members, one fewer than required by law. When the trial began September 12, there were 16 jurors in the panel, including four alternates, to assure there would be the necessary 12 jurors when deliberations began.

In less than a week, one juror had to be dismissed for personal reasons. At the close of testimony last Thursday, the judge excused two more jurors - one who was traveling to England and another who had business meetings that could not be canceled. That left only one alternate still on the jury panel. When the two traveling jurors leave Phoenix at week's end, the trial will not be able to continue until they return October 29. "Gentlemen, take notice that come Thursday, we will have to declare a mistrial or take an extensive recess," Hendrix said.

Milke is on trial for conspiracy to commit murder, first-degree murder, kidnapping and child abuse for the December 2 slaying of her only child, 4-year-old Christopher.

A long recess in the middle of a murder trial is unusual but not unprecedented. In February, Judge Kenneth Fields of Maricopa County Superior Court imposed a three-week recess in the trial of Stephen Wilson, who was charged with murder in the 1981 disappearance of Phoenix Gazette newsboy Brian Bleyl. Fields suspended the trial to travel to Europe on a vacation that had been planned months in advance and could not be rescheduled. He said the recess was in the interest of justice, because it did not impose unnecessary rushing to conclude the trial.

After the case reconvened, Wilson was acquitted of the charges.



Perryville, Arizona


line break

On Saturday, November 8, 1997, the Arizona Republic headline was

"CONTROVERSIAL JUDGE TRANSFERRED FROM CRIMINAL TO DOMESTIC CASES"

Byline by Victoria Harker, The Arizona Republic/ Republic writer Abraham Kwok contributed to this article.

A controversial judge who balked at giving the maximum sentence to a repeat child molester because his victim was not an "emotional basket case" has been removed from hearing criminal cases.

Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Cheryl Hendrix will handle domestic-relations cases instead, said Judge Robert D. Myers, presiding judge of the court. Myers said Friday that he was transferring Hendrix for several reasons, not solely because of public ire over her handling of two recent cases.

Hendrix also has been criticized for setting low bail for a young woman who sealed her newborn baby in a plastic bag and dumped him in a campground toilet at Canyon Lake. Carmelita Aguirre, an undocumented immigrant from Mexico, later skipped bail and disappeared.

Myers said he transferred Hendrix because "it was in the best interest of the court and the community. There are lots of reasons why I did it, but that is not the reason why," Myers said of the controversy surrounding the two recent cases. "I cannot discipline judges."

He added that he has never received a complaint about Hendrix acting unethically or violating the Code of Judicial Conduct. Hendrix could not be reached Friday for comment.

Her comments surrounding convicted child molester Charles Richard Yancey, 50, were one source of controversy. Yancey was on probation after serving 13 years for molesting an 8-year-old girl in cemeteries when he was arrested this year reportedly for repeatedly molesting a friend's 5-year-old daughter.

He entered a plea agreement that Hendrix said was too stiff because the victim was not "an emotional basket case." She later recused herself from the case after her office received several calls from angry citizens.

Yancey was sentenced last month by judge Mark Aceto to the maximum term under the plea agreement, 15 years, for attempted child molestation. He was also placed on lifetime probation.

The judge also had her wrist slapped in the form of a censure order from the Arizona Supreme Court for handing a man convicted of robbery a can of beans at his sentencing. The robber had left a can of beans at the checkout counter during the holdup of a convenience store.

On Friday, a small sampling of Valley attorney provided mixed reviews of Hendrix, who has served as a civil, criminal and domestic-relations judge for 15 years. "She has a personality, as do most of us," said a prosecutor who asked to remain anonymous. "As far as ... the cases I have prosecuted in her court, I have never had a problem with her. I've never observed her to make any comments out of line."

Another prosecutor who wished to remain unidentified said Hendrix occasionally made poor decisions that created a "lack of respect" for the court.

"I don't think she was a bad judge," he said. "I don't think 90 percent of her decisions were improper."

Myers said he is upset that the transfer of one judge has received publicity while the numerous national awards won by judges and the court have gone largely unnoticed.



line break

On Saturday, June 24, 2000, the Arizona Republic (Valley & State) headline was

"Commission gives judges high marks"

Byline by Antonio L. Sharp, The Arizona Republic

The public commission that monitors performances of Arizona judges has given high marks to most of the judges up for retention on the November ballot.

Fifty of the 59 judges on the general election ballot, including three justices on the state Supreme Court, received unanimous approval from the Arizona Commission on Judical Performance Review.

The criteria for the commission, which is made up of attorneys, judges and private citizens, included knowledge of the job, communications skills and the ability to steer clear of personal biases. Twenty-nine of the commission's 30 members voted.

The nine judges who did not get unanimous approval, and their vote totals are

  • Joseph W. Howard of the Court of Appeals, Division 2 (28-1)
  • Leslie Miller of Pima County Superior Court (26-2)
  • Linda Akers of Maricopa County Superior Court (26-3)
  • Crane McClennen of Maricopa County Superior Court (26-3)
  • Robert Myers of Maricopa County Superior Court (26-3)
  • Anna Baca of Maricopa County Superior Court (23-6)
  • David Cole of Maricopa County Superior Court (27-2)
  • James McDougall of Maricopa County Superior Court (22-7)
  • Cheryl Hendrix of Maricopa County Superior Court (21-8)

Commissioners based their votes on results from more than 16,000 surveys compiled by court staff, attorneys, people who have represented themselves in court and others with judical performances.

Some of the judges have retired since the report was compiled.

"Sometimes, public review is the reason many judges retire, but it is not the entire reason," said Andrea Ibanez, chairwoman of the commission. "We feel this is a form of accountability to the public."

Ibanez, a Tucson attorney's aide who has been on the copmmission since 1994, said judges who have been rated less than favorable by the commission have to answer to the voting public.

"This is just public information and is merely a recommendation from us on wether or not they have met the standards in the state Constitution."

Tucson attorney and commission member Rosemary Marquez said the panel should have more public impact.

"There is a subcommittee within the commission that meets independently with the judges to monitor their progress," she said. "It's hard for me to say what we could do better, though, because I'm new, but I wish we had a little more power."



In The Debra Jean Milke Case

Judge Cheryl K. Hendrix ...

  • allowed into evidence a seven page report of an alleged confession authored by a detective who claimed to have destroyed his notes of the interrogation, who had NO witness to this alleged confession, NO tape recording and who claims to have written it from memory. The accused neither saw, read nor signed this alleged confession.
  • allowed questionable and coerced statements of witnesses and their introduction into trial.
  • allowed a "rush-trial" due to commitments of jury members' vacation plans.
  • allowed delay tactics and omissions to inform defense council by County Attorney, NOEL LEVY.
  • disallowed pertinent affidavits of professionals (psychiatric counselors, doctors, etc.) and other important witnesses were not considered to re-open the case.
  • allowed questionable jury selection and conduct as presiding judge.


This page was last modified:
Monday, 03-Mar-2008 19:10:25 CST