|
|
|
|
Translate this page into Spanish Translate this page into French Translate this page into German using FreeTranslation.com |
|
|
On Wednesday, October 10, 1990, the Phoenix Gazette headline was "MILKE CASE FACING MISTRIAL,
|
|
|
On Saturday, November 8, 1997, the Arizona Republic headline was "CONTROVERSIAL JUDGE TRANSFERRED FROM CRIMINAL TO DOMESTIC CASES"Byline by Victoria Harker, The Arizona Republic/ Republic writer Abraham Kwok contributed to this article.A controversial judge who balked at giving the maximum sentence to a repeat child molester because his victim was not an "emotional basket case" has been removed from hearing criminal cases. Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Cheryl Hendrix will handle domestic-relations cases instead, said Judge Robert D. Myers, presiding judge of the court. Myers said Friday that he was transferring Hendrix for several reasons, not solely because of public ire over her handling of two recent cases. Hendrix also has been criticized for setting low bail for a young woman who sealed her newborn baby in a plastic bag and dumped him in a campground toilet at Canyon Lake. Carmelita Aguirre, an undocumented immigrant from Mexico, later skipped bail and disappeared. Myers said he transferred Hendrix because "it was in the best interest of the court and the community. There are lots of reasons why I did it, but that is not the reason why," Myers said of the controversy surrounding the two recent cases. "I cannot discipline judges." He added that he has never received a complaint about Hendrix acting unethically or violating the Code of Judicial Conduct. Hendrix could not be reached Friday for comment. Her comments surrounding convicted child molester Charles Richard Yancey, 50, were one source of controversy. Yancey was on probation after serving 13 years for molesting an 8-year-old girl in cemeteries when he was arrested this year reportedly for repeatedly molesting a friend's 5-year-old daughter. He entered a plea agreement that Hendrix said was too stiff because the victim was not "an emotional basket case." She later recused herself from the case after her office received several calls from angry citizens. Yancey was sentenced last month by judge Mark Aceto to the maximum term under the plea agreement, 15 years, for attempted child molestation. He was also placed on lifetime probation. The judge also had her wrist slapped in the form of a censure order from the Arizona Supreme Court for handing a man convicted of robbery a can of beans at his sentencing. The robber had left a can of beans at the checkout counter during the holdup of a convenience store. On Friday, a small sampling of Valley attorney provided mixed reviews of Hendrix, who has served as a civil, criminal and domestic-relations judge for 15 years. "She has a personality, as do most of us," said a prosecutor who asked to remain anonymous. "As far as ... the cases I have prosecuted in her court, I have never had a problem with her. I've never observed her to make any comments out of line." Another prosecutor who wished to remain unidentified said Hendrix occasionally made poor decisions that created a "lack of respect" for the court. "I don't think she was a bad judge," he said. "I don't think 90 percent of her decisions were improper." Myers said he is upset that the transfer of one judge has received publicity while the numerous national awards won by judges and the court have gone largely unnoticed. |
|
On Saturday, June 24, 2000, the Arizona Republic (Valley & State) headline was "Commission gives judges high marks"Byline by Antonio L. Sharp, The Arizona RepublicThe public commission that monitors performances of Arizona judges has given high marks to most of the judges up for retention on the November ballot. Fifty of the 59 judges on the general election ballot, including three justices on the state Supreme Court, received unanimous approval from the Arizona Commission on Judical Performance Review. The criteria for the commission, which is made up of attorneys, judges and private citizens, included knowledge of the job, communications skills and the ability to steer clear of personal biases. Twenty-nine of the commission's 30 members voted. The nine judges who did not get unanimous approval, and their vote totals are
Commissioners based their votes on results from more than 16,000 surveys compiled by court staff, attorneys, people who have represented themselves in court and others with judical performances. Some of the judges have retired since the report was compiled. "Sometimes, public review is the reason many judges retire, but it is not the entire reason," said Andrea Ibanez, chairwoman of the commission. "We feel this is a form of accountability to the public." Ibanez, a Tucson attorney's aide who has been on the copmmission since 1994, said judges who have been rated less than favorable by the commission have to answer to the voting public. "This is just public information and is merely a recommendation from us on wether or not they have met the standards in the state Constitution." Tucson attorney and commission member Rosemary Marquez said the panel should have more public impact. "There is a subcommittee within the commission that meets independently with the judges to monitor their progress," she said. "It's hard for me to say what we could do better, though, because I'm new, but I wish we had a little more power." In The Debra Jean Milke CaseJudge Cheryl K. Hendrix ...
|
|
This page was last modified: Monday, 03-Mar-2008 19:10:25 CST |