SDP (14 posts)
|
10-Apr-01, 06:47 PM (CST)
|
| 19. "RE: Sandy" |
Believer: I could hardly "twist" your words
as you do a good job yourself. Kindly read through your own
posts, and you will see how often you "change" what people
post to suit your own beliefs. I did have plenty to offer at
the trial, and I have no guilt about doing so. No, I was not
there as a fly on the wall when Debbie was plotting to have
her son murdered, nor was I there the first two times she
went with Jim and Roger on a "dry run," but I DID KNOW her
character, her actions prior, and her CONTINUOUS attempts to
"dump" her own son onto others. I witnessed first hand her
abuse, both verbally and physically to that child, AND I
also heard ON MANY OCCASIONS OUT OF HER OWN MOUTH how she
wished Christopher was not in her life. Again, whatever your
role in this is I have gone out of my way to respect,
however, PLEASE do not talk of things that YOU KNOW NOTHING
ABOUT. It is my belief that what you are posting is ONLY
what you are being told to believe, and not what you have
found on your own. I feel a great deal of pity that your
life is such that you need someone to guide your thoughts
rather than manuever them yourself, or better yet: Mind your
own business! |
| Remove | Alert |
Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote |
Top
|
|
Comment : Sandy was 'not there' but takes a plot as her point of departue ? She was 'not there' but states about two alleged "dry runs" ?
The individual she discussed with couldn't know anything first hand, but did Sandy ? She had already moved out of state at that time ...
Sandy tries to make an impression being the only relative of Debra in this discussion and uses that fact mercilessly to cover her denial. That may impress someone, but it's not evidence or witnessing hardcore facts linking an individual to a crime. |