Sandy Pickinpaugh
at 'websleuths.com' (April 2001)



SDP (14 posts) Click to EMail SDP Click to send private message to SDP Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
10-Apr-01, 06:47 PM (CST)
19. "RE: Sandy"
Believer:
I could hardly "twist" your words as you do a good job yourself. Kindly read through your own posts, and you will see how often you "change" what people post to suit your own beliefs. I did have plenty to offer at the trial, and I have no guilt about doing so. No, I was not there as a fly on the wall when Debbie was plotting to have her son murdered, nor was I there the first two times she went with Jim and Roger on a "dry run," but I DID KNOW her character, her actions prior, and her CONTINUOUS attempts to "dump" her own son onto others. I witnessed first hand her abuse, both verbally and physically to that child, AND I also heard ON MANY OCCASIONS OUT OF HER OWN MOUTH how she wished Christopher was not in her life. Again, whatever your role in this is I have gone out of my way to respect, however, PLEASE do not talk of things that YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT. It is my belief that what you are posting is ONLY what you are being told to believe, and not what you have found on your own. I feel a great deal of pity that your life is such that you need someone to guide your thoughts rather than manuever them yourself, or better yet: Mind your own business!
  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Comment : Sandy was 'not there' but takes a plot as her point of departue ? She was 'not there' but states about two alleged "dry runs" ? The individual she discussed with couldn't know anything first hand, but did Sandy ? She had already moved out of state at that time ...
Sandy tries to make an impression being the only relative of Debra in this discussion and uses that fact mercilessly to cover her denial. That may impress someone, but it's not evidence or witnessing hardcore facts linking an individual to a crime.